top of page
Your paragraph text (3 x 4 in) (3 x 4 in) (17).png
Reinstate the Constitutional Republic

Petition to Restore Unlawfully Banned Social Media Content & Protect the First Amendment Right to Petition

Addressed To:

  • The United States Congress

  • The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)

  • The Federal Trade Commission (FTC)

  • The United States Department of Justice (DOJ)

  • The United States Supreme Court

  • The Attorney General of Texas

  • The Attorney General of United States

  • The CEOs of TikTok, Instagram (Meta), Facebook (Meta), and X (Twitter)

We, the undersigned, exercise our right to petition for redress of grievances under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, demanding the immediate restoration of unlawfully banned social media content and the protection of the right to petition, associate, and express free speech on digital platforms.

Grievance:

Suppression of First Amendment Rights on Social Media

State Nationals Rock (SNR), an educational organization committed to teaching Americans about their constitutional rights, has been unlawfully censored by social media corporations, including TikTok, Instagram, Facebook (Meta), and X (Twitter).


Over 1,000 educational videos created by SNR Directors Gwendolyn, Ashley, and Kenny were banned in a single instance, demonstrating a clear and coordinated suppression of speech.


These videos promoted civic education, constitutional rights, and lawful petitioning of government, all of which are fundamental protections under the First Amendment.


The right to petition is not conditional upon the medium through which it is exercised; whether a petition is solicited in person or via social media, it remains a constitutionally protected act.


Social media platforms serve as the modern public square, where civic discourse occurs. Courts have recognized these platforms as spaces where constitutional protections should apply, particularly regarding free speech and petitioning grievances.

The actions of TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, and X in censoring lawful, educational, and non-violent content constitute an unconstitutional infringement upon First Amendment rights by:


  1. Suppressing the right to petition; preventing lawful petitions from being shared and signatures from being collected.

  2. Violating freedom of speech; silencing voices advocating for legal and civic awareness.

  3. Interfering with the right of association; blocking like-minded individuals from engaging in lawful discourse.


These platforms claim immunity under private company “terms and conditions”, yet courts have repeatedly ruled that private companies cannot infringe upon constitutional rights when operating as public forums or when coordinating with government agencies to suppress speech.

Legal Standing:

Constitutional & Case Law Precedents

We assert that these violations cannot be justified by private policies, as they directly contradict established constitutional protections:


1.  First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution

“Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” This includes the right to petition using modern communication methods, including social media.


2.  Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501 (1946)

The Supreme Court ruled that privately owned spaces that function as public forums must uphold First Amendment protections. Social media platforms operate as the modern public square, meaning they cannot arbitrarily silence constitutional speech.


3.  Packingham v. North Carolina, 582 U.S. (2017)

The Supreme Court ruled that social media is a “protected space” for free speech under the First Amendment. Any restriction on speech must meet strict constitutional scrutiny.


4.  Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969)

The government (or its corporate proxies) cannot censor speech unless it incites imminent lawless action. SNR's educational videos do not promote violence, criminal activity, or false information—yet they were banned unjustly.


5.  PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U.S. 74 (1980)

Private property used for public expression (such as shopping malls and social media platforms) cannot arbitrarily restrict free speech.


These cases reinforce that social media companies, when operating as public forums, must comply with constitutional protections. Their actions constitute a direct violation of free speech, association, and petition rights.

Redress of Grievance:

Our Demands

1. Immediate Restoration of Banned Content

We demand that TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, and X reinstate all unlawfully removed educational videos/posts from State Nationals Rock and provide transparency in their decision-making process.


2. Public Acknowledgment of Wrongful Censorship

A formal statement from these platforms recognizing that State Nationals Rock’s videos were improperly censored and acknowledging the public right to petition government without interference.


3. Legislative Action to Protect Free Speech & Petitioning on Social Media

We call upon Congress, the FCC, FTC, and DOJ to enact and enforce regulations ensuring that: social media platforms cannot remove lawful petitioning efforts; content that does not promote violence, fraud, or crime cannot be arbitrarily banned; and platforms that operate as public forums must uphold constitutional standards.


4. An Injunction Against Future Censorship of Lawful Petitions

A federal injunction prohibiting social media platforms from removing constitutionally protected speech and petitioning efforts.


5. Legal Investigation into Social Media Collusion with Government Entities

If TikTok, Instagram, or Facebook coordinated with government agencies to censor content, they may be in violation of the First Amendment. The DOJ and attorneys general must investigate whether these actions constitute illegal government-endorsed suppression of speech.

Affirmation:

By signing below, I affirm and declare that I am a living man or woman of sound mind, acting of my own free will.


I have read and understand the contents of this petition, and I sign it knowingly, willingly, and without coercion.


I understand that this petition is a lawful expression of the People’s right to petition for redress of grievances, and I add my signature as evidence of support and standing for the actions, remedies, and demands stated above.


I reserve all of my unalienable rights, waive none, and stand in honor, peace, and truth.

Please use the name on your current ID

For receiving physical affidavits, notices, or lawful documents related to future actions or lawsuits we open connected to this petition.

Petition to Restore Clean Water, Food, and Consumer Products for the American People

Addressed To:

  • The United States Congress

  • The President of the United States

  • The United States Supreme Court

  • The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

  • The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

  • The Department of Agriculture (USDA)

  • The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

  • The Federal Trade Commission (FTC)

  • The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)

  • All State Legislatures & Governors

  • All Municipal Water Suppliers, Food Manufacturers, and Consumer Goods Corporations

We, the undersigned, exercise our right to petition for redress of grievances under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, demanding the immediate halt of toxic chemicals in our water, food, and consumer products and the restoration of clean, safe, and unpolluted essentials for human health. Corporations and government agencies have systematically allowed toxic substances to infiltrate our drinking water, food supply, and daily-use products, creating a public health crisis that violates our fundamental rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Grievance:

The Systematic Poisoning of the American People

Every American has the inalienable right to access clean water, untainted food, and safe consumer goods. However, our government and regulatory agencies have failed to protect us from widespread contamination, prioritizing corporate profits over public health.


Toxic Substances in Drinking Water

  1. Fluoride – Introduced into public water supplies under the guise of dental health, yet linked to neurological disorders, lower IQ in children, and skeletal fluorosis.

  2. Chlorine & Trihalomethanes (THMs) – Used to disinfect water but react with organic matter to form carcinogenic byproducts.

  3. Atrazine & Glyphosate (Pesticide Runoff) – Disrupts the endocrine system and is linked to infertility, birth defects, and cancer.

  4. Lead, Mercury, & Arsenic – Heavy metals found in public water sources that cause neurotoxicity, kidney failure, and developmental disorders.

  5. Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS, "Forever Chemicals") – Persist in water supplies and bioaccumulate in human tissues, leading to immune system damage, thyroid disease, and cancer.


Chemical Contamination in the Food Supply

  1. Pesticides & Herbicides – Chemicals like glyphosate, atrazine, and neonicotinoids are heavily sprayed on crops, leading to toxic residues in the food supply.

  2. Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) – Engineered for resistance to chemicals like glyphosate, but linked to gut microbiome disruption and inflammatory diseases.

  3. Sodium Nitrite (cancer-linked meat preservative).

  4. Artificial Colors & Sweeteners (linked to hyperactivity, cancer, and metabolic disorders).

  5. BHA & BHT (synthetic antioxidants classified as potential carcinogens).

  6. Citric Acid (Black Mold-Derived) – Once derived from citrus fruits but now industrially produced from aspergillus niger mold.


Toxins in Consumer Goods & Kitchen Utensils

  1. Nickel, Lead & Cadmium in Cookware – Heavy metals leach into food and cause cancer, kidney damage, and reproductive harm.

  2. Teflon & Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) – Found in non-stick cookware, releasing toxic fumes when heated.

  3. Bisphenol A (BPA) & Phthalates – Used in plastics and food packaging, disrupting hormones and causing infertility.

  4. Brominated Flame Retardants (BFRs) in Kitchen Tools – Linked to neurological damage and thyroid disorders.

Legal Standing:

Constitutional & Case Law Precedents

1.  The U.S. Constitution

The Ninth Amendment; the right to clean water and food is a fundamental human right. The intentional contamination of essential resources violates natural law. The Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3); the government is responsible for regulating commerce to protect the people, yet it has permitted corporations to profit from poisoning consumers.


2.  The Public Trust Doctrine

The government holds natural resources in trust for the people, including water and food supplies. Allowing corporations to pollute these resources is a betrayal of that trust and a breach of duty.


3.  Massachusetts v. EPA, 549 U.S. 497 (2007)

Established that government agencies are responsible for regulating pollutants that impact public health. Failure to remove toxins from water and food supply violates this precedent.


4.  Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Co., 206 U.S. 230 (1907)

Supreme Court ruled that states have the right to protect their citizens from corporate pollution. If a company contaminates water, soil, or food, it must be held accountable.


5.  Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Illinois, 146 U.S. 387 (1892)

Affirmed that public resources cannot be handed over to private interests at the expense of the people. Corporations should not be allowed to sell contaminated food and water to consumers without consequences.

Redress of Grievance:

Our Demands

We, the People, demand the immediate removal of all toxic chemicals from water, food, and consumer products and full transparency about ingredients and contaminants.


1. Immediate Ban on Toxic Chemicals in Public Water Supplies

Fluoride, chlorine, THMs, PFAS, and other known harmful chemicals must be removed from municipal water systems. Advanced filtration systems must be mandated in public water treatment facilities.


2. Mandatory Transparency & Labeling in Food Production

All food products must clearly disclose pesticide residues, genetic modifications, and chemical additives. Misleading labels such as "natural flavors" and "fortified" must be abolished.


3. Regulation of Heavy Metals & Toxins in Consumer Goods

Strict limits must be placed on heavy metals in kitchenware, cookware, and food packaging. BPA, phthalates, and Teflon coatings must be banned from all food-related products.


4. Affordable Access to Clean Alternatives

Non-toxic products must be made affordable, removing the corporate monopoly that forces people to choose between health and financial stability.


5. Criminal Accountability for Corporations That Poison the Public

If an average American would be imprisoned for intentionally poisoning food or water, corporations must be held to the same standard. Government agencies that knowingly allow toxic contamination must face full legal accountability.

Affirmation:

By signing below, I affirm and declare that I am a living man or woman of sound mind, acting of my own free will.


I have read and understand the contents of this petition, and I sign it knowingly, willingly, and without coercion.


I understand that this petition is a lawful expression of the People’s right to petition for redress of grievances, and I add my signature as evidence of support and standing for the actions, remedies, and demands stated above.


I reserve all of my unalienable rights, waive none, and stand in honor, peace, and truth.

Please use the name on your current ID

For receiving physical affidavits, notices, or lawful documents related to future actions or lawsuits we open connected to this petition.

Petition to Halt Geoengineering & Weather Modification Activities

Addressed To:

  • The United States Congress

  • The President of the United States

  • The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

  • The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

  • The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • The Department of Defense (DOD)

  • The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)

  • The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

  • The United States Supreme Court

  • All Elected Representatives & State Legislatures

  • All Corporations, Military Contractors, and Research Institutions Involved in Weather Modification and Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI)

We, the undersigned, exercise our right to petition for redress of grievances under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, demanding an immediate halt to all geoengineering, stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), and weather modification programs until full disclosure and transparent, independent investigations prove these activities do not pose risks to human health, the environment, or the fundamental rights of the people.

Grievance:

The Unlawful and Harmful Contamination of Our Air, Water, and Soil

The deliberate modification of weather patterns through geoengineering and aerosol injection programs has resulted in the systematic pollution of our air, land, and water, directly violating the rights of the people to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, as guaranteed by the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution.


Geoengineering and weather modification programs, including stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), cloud seeding, and other undisclosed operations, are knowingly dispersing harmful substances into our atmosphere.


These activities have resulted in the release of aluminum, barium, strontium, sulfur dioxide, and other particulates into the only source of breathable air we have, posing significant risks to human health and ecosystems.


Respiratory diseases and neurodegenerative conditions have increased in recent years. While various factors contribute to this rise, the correlation between aerosolized heavy metal exposure and health decline cannot be ignored.


Geoengineeringwatch.org has documented and compiled evidence from patents, scientific studies, and whistleblower testimony confirming the existence and ongoing execution of geoengineering programs. This is not speculation or conspiracy—it is fact.

Legal Standing:

Constitutional & Case Law Precedents

1.  The U.S. Constitution

The spraying of heavy metals and chemicals into the air constitutes a form of biological and chemical experimentation on the American people without their informed consent, violating:

  • The Fourth Amendment; protecting against unlawful searches and seizures, which includes unconsented exposure to harmful substances.

  • The Fifth Amendment; no person shall be "deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." Poisoning the air we breathe directly threatens life and liberty.

  • The Ninth Amendment; the people retain natural rights, including the right to breathe clean air and not be subjected to involuntary environmental contamination.


2.  The Public Trust Doctrine

Under the Public Trust Doctrine, the government is obligated to protect the natural resources essential for survival, including the air, water, and land. The intentional contamination of the air violates this doctrine, as it infringes on the right of the people to a clean and livable environment.


3.  Nuremberg Code (1947)

“The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.” Geoengineering programs expose the population to experimental atmospheric modifications without consent.


4.  The Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) & Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC)

These international treaties prohibit the use of biological and chemical agents against civilian populations.


5.  The Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.)

This law requires the EPA to regulate airborne pollutants that pose a risk to public health. The intentional release of toxic heavy metals into the atmosphere is a direct violation of this act.


6. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq.)

This act requires environmental impact assessments before engaging in activities that could significantly alter ecosystems. There has been no public disclosure, environmental review, or consent process for geoengineering programs.


7. Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Co., 206 U.S. 230 (1907)

The Supreme Court ruled that states have the right to seek injunctions against environmental harm caused by corporations. If a private company can be held accountable for environmental harm, so can government and military agencies.


8. Massachusetts v. EPA, 549 U.S. 497 (2007)

The Supreme Court ruled that the EPA is responsible for regulating pollutants that impact public health. If the EPA fails to regulate geoengineering toxins, they are in breach of their duty.

Redress of Grievance:

Our Demands

We, the People, demand the immediate cessation of all geoengineering, weather modification, and atmospheric aerosol injection activities, as well as a full and independent investigation into the environmental, health, and constitutional implications of these programs.


1. Immediate Issuance of a Moratorium on All Geoengineering Programs

An emergency moratorium must be issued halting all geoengineering, weather modification, and stratospheric aerosol injection operations. No further operations may take place until full disclosure, independent investigations, and public consent are obtained.


2. Full Disclosure of All Geoengineering & Weather Modification Patents, Programs, & Contracts

The federal government must release all classified documents related to geoengineering. All corporations, contractors, and agencies involved must disclose their participation.


3. Congressional Oversight Hearings & Criminal Investigations

Congress must hold public hearings on the legality of geoengineering operations. A special independent prosecutor must be appointed to investigate violations of constitutional, environmental, and human rights laws. Any officials, corporations, or military contractors found guilty of unlawful geoengineering activities must be prosecuted under U.S. law.


4. Immediate Remediation Efforts for Environmental and Public Health Damages

The EPA and CDC must conduct independent studies on the effects of aerosolized heavy metals on human health, agriculture, and ecosystems. Any individuals harmed by geoengineering exposure must be given medical assistance and compensation.

Affirmation:

By signing below, I affirm and declare that I am a living man or woman of sound mind, acting of my own free will.


I have read and understand the contents of this petition, and I sign it knowingly, willingly, and without coercion.


I understand that this petition is a lawful expression of the People’s right to petition for redress of grievances, and I add my signature as evidence of support and standing for the actions, remedies, and demands stated above.


I reserve all of my unalienable rights, waive none, and stand in honor, peace, and truth.

Please use the name on your current ID

For receiving physical affidavits, notices, or lawful documents related to future actions or lawsuits we open connected to this petition.

Petition to Restore the Constitutional Right to a Gold and Silver-Backed National Currency

Addressed To:

  • The United States Congress

  • The President of the United States

  • The U.S. Treasury Department

  • The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

  • The U.S. Supreme Court

  • All Elected Representatives & State Legislatures

We, the undersigned, exercise our right to petition for redress of grievances under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, demanding the immediate restoration of a lawful gold and silver-backed national currency, as mandated by the U.S. Constitution and essential to economic stability, financial sovereignty, and national security.

Grievance:

The Unconstitutional Removal of Gold & Silver Backed Currency

The United States was founded on the principle that its monetary system should be backed by gold and silver, ensuring stability, honesty, and economic fairness for all. However, over time, this fundamental protection has been eroded, and our labor, rather than tangible assets, now backs the currency—facilitating inflation, economic instability, and fraud.


Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution states: “No State shall... make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts.”


This constitutional clause explicitly mandates that only gold and silver shall be recognized as lawful money.


The Federal Reserve, through gradual devaluation of U.S. currency, has systematically removed the gold and silver backing of our money, leading to:


  1. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913; created a private central banking system, granting it unconstitutional control over the nation's money supply.

  2. The Gold Reserve Act of 1934; prohibited private ownership of gold and removed the ability of citizens to demand gold in exchange for dollars.

  3. The Bretton Woods Agreement (1944) & Nixon Shock (1971); ultimately severed the link between gold and the U.S. dollar, making it a purely fiat currency controlled by the Federal Reserve, in violation of constitutional provisions.

The removal of the constitutional gold and silver standard has directly led to:


  1. Massive inflation; the Federal Reserve fraudulently prints currency without tangible backing, devaluing the purchasing power of all Americans.

  2. Debt servitude; the people are forced to work more for less, as their labor is used to back an unstable fiat system.

  3. Economic instability; without a tangible standard, financial crises occur regularly, as seen in 1929, 2008, and beyond.

  4. Unlawful taxation of labor; because fiat money is backed by labor rather than assets, citizens are unknowingly taxed through hidden inflation.


This is not just a matter of economic policy; it is a violation of fundamental rights, as our currency is no longer lawful under constitutional law.

Legal Standing:

Constitutional & Case Law Precedents

We assert that the current fiat system violates the U.S. Constitution and existing legal precedent, making its continuation an act of economic fraud and a direct attack on the liberties of the American people.


1.  The U.S. Constitution

Article I, Section 10, Clause 1: Prohibits the government from making anything but gold and silver legal tender. Article I, Section 8, Clause 5: Gives Congress, not the Federal Reserve, the authority to coin money and regulate its value. The Federal Reserve Act delegates this power unconstitutionally to a private entity.


2.  Julliard v. Greenman, 110 U.S. 421 (1884)

The Supreme Court ruled that Congress has the power to issue currency, but this ruling was based on an era when the dollar was still backed by gold and silver. The modern fiat system is unconstitutional because it lacks this backing.


3.  Craig v. Missouri, 29 U.S. 410 (1830)

The Court struck down state-issued fiat currency, affirming that only gold and silver can be used as legal tender.


4.  Perry v. United States, 294 U.S. 330 (1935)

Ruled that the government cannot repudiate its own gold obligations. This means the government was in breach of contract when it abandoned the gold standard.


5.  Legal Tender Cases (Knox v. Lee, Parker v. Davis, 79 U.S. 457 (1871))

These cases established that fiat currency could exist in wartime but never permanently replace gold and silver as legal tender.


Since the Nixon Shock (1971) permanently severed the gold backing, the U.S. government has remained in unconstitutional violation of these rulings.

Redress of Grievance:

Our Demands

We, the People, demand the immediate restoration of a lawful, gold and silver-backed currency, in compliance with the United States Constitution.


1. Congress Must Reinstate a Gold & Silver Standard

We demand that Congress repeal any unconstitutional laws supporting fiat currency and restore a system where every issued dollar is backed by tangible assets.


2. Abolition or Reform of the Federal Reserve

The Federal Reserve is an unconstitutional banking cartel that has defrauded the American people. We demand its full audit, reform, or abolition to ensure lawful, asset-backed currency.


3. Treasury Must Resume Constitutional Currency Issuance

The U.S. Treasury must stop issuing debt-based fiat currency and restore lawful gold and silver-backed tender.


4. A Congressional Investigation into Fiat Fraud & Inflation Crimes

We demand a full congressional inquiry into how the removal of gold backing has defrauded the American people.


5. Legal & Criminal Accountability for Violators

If government officials knowingly violate the Constitution, they are guilty of: fraud (issuing worthless fiat currency); emoluments violations (profiting off unconstitutional monetary policies); and/or treason (knowingly destroying lawful currency and subjecting citizens to unlawful taxation via inflation).

Affirmation:

By signing below, I affirm and declare that I am a living man or woman of sound mind, acting of my own free will.


I have read and understand the contents of this petition, and I sign it knowingly, willingly, and without coercion.


I understand that this petition is a lawful expression of the People’s right to petition for redress of grievances, and I add my signature as evidence of support and standing for the actions, remedies, and demands stated above.


I reserve all of my unalienable rights, waive none, and stand in honor, peace, and truth.

Please use the name on your current ID

For receiving physical affidavits, notices, or lawful documents related to future actions or lawsuits we open connected to this petition.

Petition to Revoke Vaccine Manufacturers' Legal Immunity & Ensure Full Transparency in Vaccine Safety

Addressed To:

  • The United States Congress

  • The President of the United States

  • The United States Supreme Court

  • The Department of Justice (DOJ)

  • The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

  • The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

  • The National Institutes of Health (NIH)

  • All State Legislatures & Governors

  • All Vaccine Manufacturers, Including Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, and GlaxoSmithKline

  • All Hospitals & Healthcare Providers Enforcing Mandatory Vaccination Policies

We, the undersigned, exercise our right to petition for redress of grievances under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, demanding the immediate revocation of legal immunity for vaccine manufacturers, full transparency in vaccine ingredients, and the right of parents to refuse any vaccine without coercion or legal retaliation. For decades, vaccine manufacturers have been shielded from liability under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NCVIA), preventing families from seeking justice when their children suffer from vaccine-related injuries or death. This is a direct violation of the fundamental principles of accountability, informed consent, and parental rights.

Grievance:

The Unlawful Protection of Vaccine Manufacturers & Violation of Parental Rights

Parents across the nation—and the world—are facing the devastating consequences of vaccine-related injuries, often with no legal recourse against the manufacturers responsible. These injuries include:


  1. Neurological damage, developmental delays, and autism spectrum disorders linked to toxic vaccine ingredients.

  2. Adverse reactions, including seizures, autoimmune disorders, and sudden deaths.

  3. The coercion of parents into vaccinating their newborns under the threat of losing custody of their children.


Under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986, vaccine manufacturers were granted immunity from lawsuits related to vaccine injuries. This violates the fundamental principle of accountability, as no other industry is granted such broad legal protection when their products harm individuals. If a car manufacturer knowingly sells a defective vehicle that causes harm, they can be sued. Why should vaccine manufacturers be exempt?


Many vaccines contain potentially harmful ingredients, including aluminum, mercury (thimerosal), formaldehyde, and polysorbate 80, which have been linked to neurological damage and autoimmune disorders. Dr. Paul Thomas's decade-long study found that unvaccinated children exhibited fewer chronic health conditions than vaccinated children, yet this data is suppressed. Parents have the right to full disclosure of all vaccine ingredients and their potential risks before making a decision.

Legal Standing:

Constitutional & Case Law Precedents

1.  The U.S. Constitution

The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unlawful government intrusion into personal decisions, including medical choices. The Fifth Amendment ensures due process and equal protection under the law, which are violated when parents are coerced into vaccinating their children against their will. The Ninth Amendment reserves the rights of the people, including the right to make medical decisions without government coercion.


2.  The Nuremberg Code (1947)

The Nuremberg Code (1947) states that informed consent is an absolute requirement for medical interventions. Coercing parents into vaccinating their children under the threat of legal repercussions violates this principle and constitutes medical tyranny.


3.  Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905)

While often cited to justify vaccine mandates, this case actually established that medical decisions must balance public health with individual rights and cannot impose unreasonable harm.


4.  Doe v. Rumsfeld, 341 F. Supp. 2d 1 (2004)

Ruled that the government cannot force individuals to take an experimental vaccine without informed consent.


5.  Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC, 562 U.S. 223 (2011)

This case upheld vaccine manufacturers' immunity but also acknowledged the existence of vaccine injuries, proving the need for legal accountability.


6. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health, 497 U.S. 261 (1990)

Established that individuals have the right to refuse medical treatment, reinforcing bodily autonomy.

Redress of Grievance:

Our Demands

We, the People, demand immediate legislative action to ensure vaccine manufacturers are held accountable, parental rights are protected, and full transparency in vaccine safety is upheld.


1. Repeal the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) & Restore Manufacturer Liability

Vaccine manufacturers must be held legally accountable for injuries and deaths caused by their products. No other industry is allowed to escape liability—vaccine manufacturers should be no exception.


2. Implement Full Transparency in Vaccine Ingredients & Risks

Every vaccine package must include a complete list of ingredients, with independent studies confirming their safety. Parents must be provided with full disclosure of all risks before consenting to vaccination.


3. Protect Parental Rights to Refuse Vaccination Without Retaliation

No parent should face loss of custody, medical discrimination, or legal action for choosing not to vaccinate their child. The right to informed consent and medical freedom must be legally protected.


4. Launch an Independent Investigation Into Vaccine Safety & Long-Term Effects

A congressionally mandated investigation must be conducted into:

  • The rise of autism, autoimmune disorders, and neurological conditions linked to vaccination.

  • The suppression of studies proving vaccine harm.

  • The role of the CDC, FDA, and WHO in concealing vaccine-related injuries.


5. Hold Hospitals & Medical Institutions Accountable for Coercion

Hospitals must be prohibited from forcing vaccinations on newborns and infants without parental consent. Any institution found violating parental rights must be held legally accountable.

Affirmation:

By signing below, I affirm and declare that I am a living man or woman of sound mind, acting of my own free will.


I have read and understand the contents of this petition, and I sign it knowingly, willingly, and without coercion.


I understand that this petition is a lawful expression of the People’s right to petition for redress of grievances, and I add my signature as evidence of support and standing for the actions, remedies, and demands stated above.


I reserve all of my unalienable rights, waive none, and stand in honor, peace, and truth.

Please use the name on your current ID

For receiving physical affidavits, notices, or lawful documents related to future actions or lawsuits we open connected to this petition.

Petition to Restore the Unincorporated, Constitutional Republic

Addressed To:

  • The United States Congress

  • The President of the United States

  • The United States Supreme Court

  • The Department of Education

  • The National Archives and Records Administration

  • All State Legislatures and Governors

  • All Elected Representatives and Public Servants

We, the undersigned, exercise our right to petition for redress of grievances under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, demanding the restoration of the unincorporated Constitutional Republic as established by our founding documents—the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, and the Constitution of the United States. The unlawful transformation of the United States into a corporate democracy has led to the erosion of fundamental rights, the violation of constitutional law, and the subjugation of the people under private commercial interests rather than a government of the people, by the people, and for the people.

Grievance:

The Unlawful Transition from a Constitutional Republic to a Corporate Democracy

The United States of America was founded as a Constitutional Republic, not a democracy. This is made explicitly clear in our founding documents:


  1. The Declaration of Independence established that governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed and exist to protect the God-given rights of the people.

  2. The Articles of Confederation reaffirmed that the states were free and independent, bound together by a mutual compact of self-governance.

  3. The United States Constitution (Article IV, Section 4) explicitly states: “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government.”


The Constitutional Republic our founders established is based on rule of law, where unalienable rights are protected against government overreach. A democracy, on the other hand, is based on majority rule, where the rights of the minority can be easily overridden.

The word “democracy” does not appear in any of our founding documents.


Through unlawful acts, corporate structuring, and legal deception, the United States government has been incorporated and restructured into a corporate democracy, where the interests of private entities and globalist agendas have overtaken the constitutional authority of We the People.


The Act of 1871 created “The United States Corporation”, redefining the federal government as a private entity operating under commercial law rather than constitutional law. This act transformed the seat of government into a private municipal corporation, separating it from the sovereign republic.


The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 unlawfully transferred control of the U.S. monetary system to a private banking cartel, in direct violation of the Constitution’s mandate that only Congress has the power to coin money and regulate its value (Article I, Section 8, Clause 5). This resulted in the enslavement of the people under a fraudulent debt-based currency system rather than a system serving the free and sovereign states of the republic.


There has also been a replacement of civic education with misinformation. Public education has failed to teach Americans the truth about our founding documents, our Constitutional Republic, and our rights. A 2017 Annenberg Public Policy Center study found that only 26% of Americans can name the three branches of government, proving the systematic suppression of civic knowledge.

Legal Standing:

Constitutional & Case Law Precedents

1.  Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886)

The Supreme Court ruled that constitutional rights are not subject to the whims of government or popular vote. This affirms that a Constitutional Republic is the only lawful government in the U.S.


2.  Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)

Established that any law repugnant to the Constitution is void. This means all acts that have unlawfully transformed the U.S. into a corporate democracy must be nullified.


3.  Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)

Although later overturned on racial grounds, this case confirmed that the federal government cannot alter or abolish constitutional rights through legal maneuvering.


4.  Bond v. United States, 564 U.S. 211 (2011)

Reaffirmed that the federal government exists only by consent of the people and cannot exceed its constitutionally granted powers.

Redress of Grievance:

Our Demands

We, the People, demand the immediate restoration of the Constitutional Republic, including the following actions:


1. Immediate Declaration and Restoration of Constitutional Governance

Congress must publicly acknowledge the Constitutional Republic as the only lawful government. The incorporated government of the United States (established in 1871) must be legally dissolved as an unlawful entity.


2. Removal of Unconstitutional Legislation & Fraudulent Corporate Structures

The Act of 1871 must be repealed and the federal government returned to its proper constitutional form. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 must be abolished, and monetary policy must return to lawful governance by Congress. All unconstitutional executive orders, corporate statutes, and regulatory overreach must be repealed.


3. Full Public Investigation into the Corporate Takeover of the U.S. Government

Congress must conduct a full independent investigation into the corporate structuring of the U.S. government and its unlawful transition from a Constitutional Republic. All officials and entities involved in unconstitutional governance must be held accountable.


4. National Mandate for Constitutional Education

A nationwide civic education program must be implemented to teach Americans:

  • What the Constitution and founding documents establish.

  • The meaning of a Constitutional Republic vs. a democracy.

  • The Bill of Rights and how to exercise and enforce them.

  • The lawful remedies available when constitutional rights are violated.

This must be required education for all public servants, teachers, law enforcement, and judicial officers.

Affirmation:

By signing below, I affirm and declare that I am a living man or woman of sound mind, acting of my own free will.


I have read and understand the contents of this petition, and I sign it knowingly, willingly, and without coercion.


I understand that this petition is a lawful expression of the People’s right to petition for redress of grievances, and I add my signature as evidence of support and standing for the actions, remedies, and demands stated above.


I reserve all of my unalienable rights, waive none, and stand in honor, peace, and truth.

Please use the name on your current ID

For receiving physical affidavits, notices, or lawful documents related to future actions or lawsuits we open connected to this petition.

Petition to Restore the Unincorporated Status of American Citizens & Nationals

Addressed To:

  • The United States Congress

  • The President of the United States

  • The United States Supreme Court

  • The Department of State

  • The United States Secretary of State

  • The Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

  • The Department of Commerce

  • The Department of Justice (DOJ)

  • The Social Security Administration (SSA)

  • The Office of Management and Budget (OMB)

  • The National Archives and Records Administration

  • All State Legislatures & Governors

We, the undersigned, exercise our right to petition for redress of grievances under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, demanding the immediate restoration of the unincorporated status of American citizens and nationals and the recognition of all Americans as living men and women, not corporate entities. From birth, our natural rights have been unlawfully converted into commercial privileges, stripping us of our sovereignty and placing us into an incorporated system without full and honest disclosure or consent. We demand the restoration of our lawful status as private, unincorporated American Nationals, free from the corporate jurisdiction imposed upon us through fraudulent legal mechanisms.

Grievance:

The Fraudulent Incorporation of Living People into a Corporate System

From the moment of birth, Americans are unknowingly entered into a commercial jurisdiction through fraudulent conversion, unlawfully stripping them of their unalienable rights.


Parents unknowingly sign birth certificates as “informants”. The legal definition of an “informant” is one who transfers ownership or provides evidence of a transaction—meaning that parents unknowingly “gift” their child’s title and equity to the incorporated government. The birth certificate is printed on bond paper, signifying that each citizen is turned into a financial asset for the corporate state.


Once the birth certificate is registered, the living child is fraudulently converted into a corporate entity (CITIZEN) subject to commercial law, rather than a sovereign individual under natural law. This incorporation places all Americans under statutory and commercial codes rather than common law, forcing them to operate within a legal fiction they never agreed to.


Americans are forced to use Social Security Numbers (SSNs) as corporate identifiers for financial and legal transactions.


The IRS enforces taxation on labor, even though the original tax system was voluntary and meant to fund war efforts that are no longer ongoing.


The right to travel freely has been unlawfully converted into a commercial privilege, requiring licenses, registrations, and fees for activities that were once God-given rights.


Unalienable rights—such as the right to own property, travel freely, and engage in private contracts—have been converted into state-granted privileges requiring fees and regulatory compliance.


Statutory commercial laws, originally meant for corporations and businesses, are now unjustly forced upon living people, restricting their natural freedoms.


Americans should be lawfully recognized as private, unincorporated individuals under common law, not corporate business entities. The requirement to repudiate U.S. corporate citizenship in order to reclaim sovereignty is an unjust and unlawful burden. The default status of every American should be unincorporated and sovereign, with the right to opt into commercial activity only if they so choose.

Legal Standing:

Constitutional & Case Law Precedents

We assert that these violations cannot be justified by private policies, as they directly contradict established constitutional protections:


1.  The U.S. Constitution

The Fifth Amendment; forcing Americans into a corporate system from birth—without full disclosure or voluntary consent—violates their right to liberty and property. The Ninth Amendment; the conversion of natural rights into regulated privileges is a form of coercion and unlawful deprivation of liberty. The government does not have the authority to convert God-given rights into man-made privileges. The unincorporated status of living people is a natural right that should never have been tampered with. The Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3); commercial laws were meant to regulate businesses, not private individuals. The forced application of commercial statutes onto the people is an unconstitutional overreach.


2.  The Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution

The Fourteenth Amendment was unlawfully used to create the all-capitalized corporate CITIZEN identity, stripping Americans of their natural rights. By assigning individuals a commercial legal identity, the government has deprived them of property (their sovereignty) without due process.


3.  Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906)

Established that corporate entities do not have the same rights as living people. If corporations do not have unalienable rights, then living people should not be forced into corporate status.


4.  Bond v. United States, 564 U.S. 211 (2011)

Reaffirmed that the federal government exists only by the consent of the people. Any fraudulent conversion of status without consent is null and void.


5.  Crandall v. Nevada, 73 U.S. 35 (1867)

Confirmed the right of free movement without taxation or restrictions. Licensing and registration schemes for travel violate this precedent.


6. Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)

Established that any law repugnant to the Constitution is void. The conversion of natural-born individuals into corporate entities is repugnant to the Constitution and must be undone.

Redress of Grievance:

Our Demands

We, the People, demand the immediate recognition and restoration of our unincorporated status as free and sovereign men and women.


1. Immediate Recognition of American Nationals as Private, Unincorporated Individuals

End the automatic conversion of all Americans into corporate entities upon birth. Allow all Americans to be recognized as living men and women under common law by default.


2. Elimination of Fraudulent Legal Conversion at Birth

Require full disclosure to parents before birth registration. Provide an alternative birth declaration that does not result in corporate incorporation.


3. Restoration of Unalienable Rights Free from Corporate Conversion

Eliminate licensing, taxation, and regulatory schemes that unlawfully convert rights into privileges. Restore the right to travel freely without commercial restrictions. End mandatory taxation obligations tied to a fraudulent commercial system.


4. Abolition of Forced Corporate Jurisdiction Over the People

Ensure that commercial codes and statutory laws do not unlawfully infringe upon the rights of private American Nationals. Allow individuals to choose when, where, and how to operate in commerce if they so choose.

Affirmation:

By signing below, I affirm and declare that I am a living man or woman of sound mind, acting of my own free will.


I have read and understand the contents of this petition, and I sign it knowingly, willingly, and without coercion.


I understand that this petition is a lawful expression of the People’s right to petition for redress of grievances, and I add my signature as evidence of support and standing for the actions, remedies, and demands stated above.


I reserve all of my unalienable rights, waive none, and stand in honor, peace, and truth.

Please use the name on your current ID

For receiving physical affidavits, notices, or lawful documents related to future actions or lawsuits we open connected to this petition.

Petition to Restore the Right to Travel Privately & Unincorporated

Addressed To:

  • The United States Congress

  • The President of the United States

  • The United States Supreme Court

  • The Department of Transportation (DOT)

  • The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)

  • The Department of Justice (DOJ)

  • The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA)

  • The American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA)

  • All State Legislatures & Governors

  • All Police Departments, Law Enforcement Agencies, and State Highway Patrols

We, the undersigned, exercise our right to petition for redress of grievances under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, demanding the immediate restoration and recognition of the unincorporated right to travel privately, free from unlawful licensing, registration, insurance requirements, and commercial enforcement mechanisms. The unlawful conversion of natural-born individuals into corporate entities (U.S. CITIZENS) has subjected private travelers to commercial codes and statutory restrictions never meant to apply to them. Law enforcement agencies and government officials, often unknowingly or through improper training, violate our right to travel by treating it as a state-controlled privilege, rather than the unalienable right it truly is.

Grievance:

The Unlawful Conversion of Travel Into a Privilege

The right to travel freely and unencumbered is a fundamental right, yet Americans are unlawfully subjected to:


  1. Forced compliance with commercial licensing and registration laws that were originally designed for businesses operating in commerce, not private individuals traveling for personal affairs.

  2. Fines, fees, and potential jail time for so-called “victimless crimes” where there is no injured party, violating due process and principles of fairness.

  3. Unjust taxation through insurance and registration mandates that restrict access to the roads that are funded by taxpayer money.

  4. Fear and anxiety during interactions with law enforcement, knowing that a simple traffic stop over an arbitrary infraction could lead to mental, emotional, physical, or financial hardship or incarceration.


The government unlawfully converted the natural-born status of Americans into corporate CITIZENS, making them subject to statutory codes that only apply to commerce. The driver’s license system is based on regulating commercial activity, yet private travelers are forced into this framework without disclosure or consent.


Speed limits, license requirements, and registration mandates were designed to regulate commercial activity, such as trucking and for-hire driving. Private individuals operating personal conveyances are not engaged in commerce and should not be subject to these rules.


Fines for victimless infractions create a revenue-generating scheme for the state, forcing individuals into labor to pay off fees for “crimes” that harmed no one. No person should be imprisoned, fined, or penalized for an act that causes no harm to another human being or their property.


Law enforcement officers are trained to enforce commercial codes against private travelers without knowledge of the lawful distinction.


A $100 ticket can ruin a family’s financial stability, taking away resources meant for food, shelter, and basic living expenses. The threat of arrest over victimless infractions creates a culture of fear rather than a society based on trust and true public safety.

Legal Standing:

Constitutional & Case Law Precedents

1.  The U.S. Constitution

The Privileges and Immunities Clause, Article IV, Section 2; the Supreme Court has long recognized the right to travel freely without undue government interference. Any requirement that forces individuals to pay for a privilege that is an unalienable right is unconstitutional. The Fifth Amendment; the imposition of fines, penalties, and imprisonment for traveling without a commercial license is a deprivation of liberty without due process of law. The inability to challenge commercial regulations imposed on private travelers is a violation of procedural due process. The Commerce Clause, Article I, Section 8, Clause 3; the federal government has no authority to regulate private travel under commercial law. Traffic statutes and licensing requirements should only apply to those engaged in for-profit transportation.


2.  Crandall v. Nevada, 73 U.S. 35 (1867)

The Supreme Court ruled that the right to travel freely is a fundamental right that cannot be taxed or restricted by states. State licensing, registration, and fines on private travelers violate this precedent.


3.  Kent v. Dulles, 357 U.S. 116 (1958)

The Court held that travel is not a mere privilege but a fundamental right. Requiring licensing to travel violates this ruling.


4.  Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969)

Ruled that laws impeding the right to travel must pass strict scrutiny and serve a compelling government interest. Traffic codes applied to private travelers fail to meet this test.


5.  Murdoch v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943)

Ruled that the government cannot charge a fee to exercise a constitutional right. Licensing and registration fees for private travel are unconstitutional.

Redress of Grievance:

Our Demands

We, the People, demand the immediate recognition and restoration of the right to travel freely and unincorporated, without interference by commercial statutes, unlawful licensing, or oppressive financial penalties.


1. Recognition That Travel Is a Right, Not a Privilege

The federal and state governments must acknowledge that travel is an unalienable right that cannot be lawfully restricted. Licensing, registration, and insurance mandates for non-commercial travelers must be abolished.


2. Elimination of Victimless Traffic Laws for Private Travelers

If there is no injured party, there should be no crime. No person should be fined, jailed, or penalized for a statutory violation where no harm has been done to another person or their property.


3. Removal of Commercial Licensing for Non-Commercial Travelers

If an individual is not engaged in commerce, they should not be required to obtain a commercial driver’s license. The forced registration of private automobiles as “motor vehicles” under commercial jurisdiction must be abolished.


4. Protection from Government Overreach & Unjust Punishment

Law enforcement agencies must be retrained to recognize the lawful distinction between private travel and commercial driving. All financial penalties imposed on victimless infractions must be removed. The public must be informed of their right to travel without state interference.

Affirmation:

By signing below, I affirm and declare that I am a living man or woman of sound mind, acting of my own free will.


I have read and understand the contents of this petition, and I sign it knowingly, willingly, and without coercion.


I understand that this petition is a lawful expression of the People’s right to petition for redress of grievances, and I add my signature as evidence of support and standing for the actions, remedies, and demands stated above.


I reserve all of my unalienable rights, waive none, and stand in honor, peace, and truth.

Please use the name on your current ID

For receiving physical affidavits, notices, or lawful documents related to future actions or lawsuits we open connected to this petition.

Petition to Restore Honorable Voting & Electoral Systems in the Constitutional Republic

Addressed To:

  • The United States Congress

  • The President of the United States

  • The United States Supreme Court

  • The Federal Election Commission (FEC)

  • The National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS)

  • The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC)

  • The Department of Justice (DOJ), Civil Rights Division

  • All State Legislatures & Governors

  • All County & Local Election Boards

We, the undersigned, exercise our right to petition for redress of grievances under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, demanding the immediate restoration of a transparent, accountable, and honorable voting system that upholds the original, organic, unincorporated Constitutional Republic and the will of the people. The current electoral system has been converted into a corporate-controlled mechanism, designed to give the illusion of choice while ensuring that power remains in the hands of corporate and globalist interests. This fraudulent incorporation of the U.S. government and electoral process has deprived the people of lawful representation and governance.

Grievance:

The Commercialization & Corruption of the American Voting System

The right to vote is a fundamental expression of the people's power, yet the current election system has been hijacked by commercial entities and fraud, leaving Americans without a legitimate voice in their government.


The United States of America, originally founded as an unincorporated Constitutional Republic, was unlawfully converted into a corporate entity (U.S., Inc.), making all government offices corporate executive positions rather than lawful representatives of the people. The President of the United States is legally the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of a corporation, not a public servant within the Constitutional Republic.


Just as the government was incorporated, U.S. citizens were fraudulently converted into commercial entities through birth certificates, Social Security, and statutory codes—removing their standing as free people under common law. Voting within a corporate system only elects executives of a business entity, not true representatives of the people.


Mail-in voting, ballot harvesting, and unverifiable electronic systems have completely compromised election integrity. There is no meaningful in-person verification to ensure votes are cast by living, lawful, and eligible citizens. The lack of transparency in vote counting and election oversight has resulted in widespread fraud and manipulation.


Elected officials serve corporate and globalist interests, not the people who voted for them. There are no direct mechanisms for the people to remove corrupt officials or demand accountability for election fraud. The corporate government has refused to disclose its true commercial nature and continues to operate under deception.

Legal Standing:

Constitutional & Case Law Precedents

1.  The U.S. Constitution

The Guarantee Clause, Article IV, Section 4; “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government.” The United States is unlawfully operating as a corporate democracy, rather than a Constitutional Republic, violating this fundamental provision. The First Amendment; the people have never been given full disclosure of the corporate nature of the government and its impact on elections, depriving them of informed participation in governance. Any attempt to expose voting fraud or corporate control over elections is censored or dismissed, violating free speech and the right to redress grievances. The Fifth Amendment; voters have been denied equal protection under the law due to fraudulent electoral processes that favor commercial interests over lawful governance. Due process is violated when elections are manipulated, and votes are counted in secret without public oversight.


2.  Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886)

Established that government must operate in good faith and cannot enforce laws that are applied in a fraudulent or biased manner. Election fraud and corporate control over voting violate this precedent.


3.  Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964)

Confirmed that elections must be conducted in a way that ensures every vote is counted fairly and honestly. Unverified mail-in ballots, electronic voting manipulation, and lack of transparency violate this ruling.


4.  Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000)

Reaffirmed that equal protection applies to voting processes and any unfair advantage given to certain votes invalidates an election. The 2020 and other modern elections, which allowed unverifiable votes, directly contradict this ruling.


5.  Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)

Established that any law or government action that is unconstitutional is null and void. If elections are fraudulent and the government is operating as a corporation rather than a republic, the entire system must be lawfully dismantled and restored.

Redress of Grievance:

Our Demands

We, the People, demand the immediate restoration of a lawful, transparent, and accountable voting system within the unincorporated Constitutional Republic.


1. Full and Honest Disclosure of the Commercial Nature of the U.S. Government & Voting System

The American people must be officially informed that their votes are currently electing corporate executives, not constitutional representatives. The government must acknowledge and rectify the unlawful incorporation of public offices into corporate structures.


2. Restoration of the Original, Organic, Unincorporated Constitutional Republic

The American people never consented to the corporate takeover of their government. The Republic must be reinstated, and elected officials must be held accountable under common law, not corporate statutes.


3. A Transparent & Honorable Voting System

All elections must be conducted in person, with proper identification and verification. Mail-in voting, electronic ballot manipulation, and any unverifiable voting methods must be abolished. Votes must be publicly counted and recorded with real-time accountability, viewable by all citizens and nationals.


4. The Right to Hold Elected Officials Accountable

Any official who commits fraud, violates their oath, or acts against the interests of the people must be immediately and publicly removed from office. The people must have the direct power to recall, investigate, and prosecute corrupt officials. An independent citizens’ oversight committee must be established to ensure election integrity.

Affirmation:

By signing below, I affirm and declare that I am a living man or woman of sound mind, acting of my own free will.


I have read and understand the contents of this petition, and I sign it knowingly, willingly, and without coercion.


I understand that this petition is a lawful expression of the People’s right to petition for redress of grievances, and I add my signature as evidence of support and standing for the actions, remedies, and demands stated above.


I reserve all of my unalienable rights, waive none, and stand in honor, peace, and truth.

Please use the name on your current ID

For receiving physical affidavits, notices, or lawful documents related to future actions or lawsuits we open connected to this petition.

Petition to Restore Americans' Right to Lawful Taxation & Reform the IRS and Income Tax System

Addressed To:

  • The United States Congress

  • The President of the United States

  • The United States Supreme Court

  • The Department of the Treasury

  • The Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

  • The Government Accountability Office (GAO)

  • The Department of Justice (DOJ)

  • All State Legislatures & Governors

  • All Oversight Committees on Taxation and Government Spending

We, the undersigned, exercise our sacred right to petition for redress of grievances under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, demanding the full restoration of lawful, constitutional taxation in the United States and the reformation of the IRS and all systems associated with unlawful income taxation. This petition calls for a return to an honorable, transparent, and limited tax system aligned with the original intent of the Founding Fathers, and an end to the private corporate enforcement structure that has enslaved generations of Americans under the false color of law.

Grievance:

The Unlawful Transformation of Taxation Into Financial Slavery

The original, Constitutional framework for taxation was designed to be: voluntary through consumption, not forcefully extracted from wages; transparent, not hidden behind bureaucratic threats; and limited, not weaponized against the people.


The Constitution authorizes only:


  1. Duties, Imposts, and Excises (Article I, Sec. 8, Cl. 1) — Indirect, voluntary, uniform taxes.

  2. Apportioned Direct Taxes (Article I, Sec. 9, Cl. 4) — Rare, proportionally divided by population.

  3. No income tax on labor or wages. (Upheld in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co., 1895)


The Constitution was designed to limit the taxing power of the federal government, not expand it. The Founders had just fought a war over taxation without representation and were deeply skeptical of centralized power. They understood that excessive taxation is tyranny.


In 1913, the 16th Amendment allegedly authorized income tax without apportionment. However, Bill Benson’s historic investigation, documented in The Law That Never Was, shows it was never legally ratified. Many states rejected or altered the amendment in violation of Article V ratification procedures. Certified state records prove it was fraudulently declared adopted. For exposing this truth, Benson was unlawfully prosecuted, censored, and imprisoned—not for fraud or violence, but for revealing historical fact.


The IRS is not a government agency in the constitutional sense. It functions as the collection arm of the Federal Reserve, a private banking cartel. Whistleblowers like Sherry Peel Jackson, a former IRS agent, exposed that: there is no law requiring the average American to pay federal income tax; and Income Tax revenue does not fund public services—it pays interest on national debt to private bankers. For telling the truth, she was targeted and imprisoned for four years.


Former IRS Criminal Investigation Division Special Agent Joseph Banister serves as a powerful example of unlawful retaliation and abuse of power. Banister conducted independent legal research while employed at the IRS, compiling a 95-page report questioning the constitutional authority of the federal income tax. Rather than answer his questions, the IRS demanded his resignation. In 2005, he was criminally indicted, yet acquitted on all counts after his own supervisor testified under oath that he could not cite any law requiring average Americans to pay income tax. Following his acquittal, Banister was targeted again—this time through civil penalties, amounting to $6,000 for so-called infractions. This violated his Fifth Amendment protections against double jeopardy and due process. It also infringed upon his First Amendment rights by punishing him for lawfully questioning the system. His case exemplifies the government’s misuse of civil law to punish those who expose truth—further proving the need for immediate reform.


President Reagan’s audit confirmed the fraud. The Grace Commission Report (1984) stated “100% of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the federal debt and by transfer payments. Not one penny goes to reduce the debt or finance government.” Your federal income tax dollars do not build roads, fund schools, or support communities—they serve banking cartels and unconstitutional systems.

Legal Standing:

Constitutional & Case Law Precedents

1.  The U.S. Constitution

The First Amendment; patriots like Bill Benson, Sherry Peel Jackson, and Joe Banister were unlawfully silenced for exercising free speech and educationally exposing corruption to the public. The Fourth and Fifth Amendments; forced taxation on wages without apportionment or due process is a seizure of property without just compensation. The Tenth Amendment; taxation systems not listed in the Constitution are unlawful federal overreach.


2.  Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co., 157 U.S. 429 (1895)

Held that income taxes on wages and personal property are unconstitutional unless apportioned.


3.  Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)

“A law repugnant to the Constitution is void.”


4.  Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916)

Confirmed that the 16th Amendment did not authorize any new taxing powers.


5.  Flora v. United States, 362 U.S. 145 (1960)

Recognized that the tax system operates only under the “voluntary compliance” principle, which implies consent is required.

Redress of Grievance:

Our Demands

1. Abolish the IRS as a Corporate Enforcement Arm

Dissolve the IRS in its current form. Create a non-corporate, constitutional revenue office accountable to the People and restricted to lawful taxes only.


2. End Federal Income Tax on Wages, Labor, and Property

Return to indirect taxation through tariffs, duties, and excises only. Abolish any direct, unapportioned taxes on personal labor.


3. Public Audit and Nullification of the 16th Amendment

Reopen and legally review Bill Benson’s documented findings. Declare the 16th Amendment unlawful if proven not ratified.


4. Protect Whistleblowers and Truth-Tellers

Enact federal protections for those exposing fraud and unconstitutional practices in government and finance. Investigate retaliatory actions against Banister post-acquittal. Posthumously vindicate and honor patriots like Benson, Jackson, and Banister.


5. Full Public Disclosure of All Tax Revenue and Spending

Every dollar collected must be publicly traceable. Create a public digital ledger of all taxation and spending.


6. End All Tax Enforcement Based on Fear, Threat, or Coercion

Peaceful Americans should never face jail, wage garnishment, or property seizure for refusing to participate in an unlawful, fraudulent, or misrepresented system.

Affirmation:

By signing below, I affirm and declare that I am a living man or woman of sound mind, acting of my own free will.


I have read and understand the contents of this petition, and I sign it knowingly, willingly, and without coercion.


I understand that this petition is a lawful expression of the People’s right to petition for redress of grievances, and I add my signature as evidence of support and standing for the actions, remedies, and demands stated above.


I reserve all of my unalienable rights, waive none, and stand in honor, peace, and truth.

Please use the name on your current ID

For receiving physical affidavits, notices, or lawful documents related to future actions or lawsuits we open connected to this petition.

Petition to Halt All United Nations (UN) and World Economic Forum (WEF) Agenda 2030 Policies & Agendas by Elected Officials

Addressed To:

  • The United States Congress

  • The President of the United States

  • The United States Supreme Court

  • The Department of Justice (DOJ)

  • The Department of State

  • All State Legislatures & Governors

  • All Elected Representatives & Public Servants

We, the undersigned, exercise our right to petition for redress of grievances under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, demanding the immediate halt of all policies, laws, and agendas influenced by the United Nations (UN) and the World Economic Forum (WEF), including Agenda 2030, until full public disclosure, transparency, and lawful consent of the American people are obtained. These international organizations do not have legislative authority over the United States and cannot lawfully dictate policies that override national sovereignty, state rights, or the constitutional liberties of the people.

Grievance:

The Unlawful Implementation of Foreign Agendas Without Public Consent

The United Nations (UN) and World Economic Forum (WEF) have been influencing American policy-making through undisclosed and non-transparent agreements that bypass the constitutional legislative process. Their programs, including Agenda 2030, claim to promote "sustainable development," but in reality, prioritize global governance, corporate control, and the erosion of individual rights without the informed consent of the American people.


The United States is a sovereign nation governed by the Constitution and the will of its people—not by foreign organizations. Any elected official implementing foreign directives without congressional approval and public consent is in direct violation of their oath of office.


Agenda 2030 and related WEF initiatives have been implemented at local, state, and federal levels without full disclosure or public debate. Hawai'i Governor Josh Green openly admitted to advancing UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) without a democratic vote, setting a dangerous precedent for unelected global organizations to dictate local policies.


The strategic partnership between the UN and WEF (signed in 2019) demonstrates a clear corporate takeover of global governance. Policies influenced by the WEF and UN serve multinational corporations, financial elites, and technocratic interests—not the American people.


Under the U.S. Constitution, only Congress has the authority to make laws and treaties (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 & Article II, Section 2, Clause 2). Any executive order, local government initiative, or policy implementing WEF or UN directives without congressional approval is unconstitutional.

Legal Standing:

Constitutional & Case Law Precedents

1.  Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957)

The Supreme Court ruled that treaties and international agreements cannot override the U.S. Constitution. Any attempt to implement UN or WEF policies that infringe on constitutional rights is null and void.


2.  United States v. Belmont, 301 U.S. 324 (1937)

Reinforced that the U.S. cannot surrender its sovereignty to foreign bodies through executive agreements or policy implementation.


3.  Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997)

Federal government cannot force local or state officials to enforce policies that violate the Constitution. Any local or state adoption of WEF or UN mandates without the consent of Congress is unlawful.


4.  Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (1952)

Established that the President cannot make laws or override congressional authority. Any executive orders enforcing UN or WEF policies without legislative approval violate this precedent.

Redress of Grievance:

Our Demands

We, the People, demand an immediate halt to all policies, laws, and initiatives influenced by the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, and any other non-governmental foreign entities, unless explicitly authorized through lawful congressional approval and full public disclosure.


1. Immediate Halt & Repeal of All UN & WEF-Inspired Policies

All federal, state, and local governments must cease the implementation of Agenda 2030 policies, climate initiatives, and any WEF-aligned programs. All executive orders, local government agreements, and regulatory rules influenced by these foreign entities must be repealed.


2. Full Congressional Investigation Into Foreign Influence Over U.S. Policy

Congress must launch a formal investigation into the role of the UN, WEF, and related organizations in shaping U.S. policy without lawful approval. All elected officials, agencies, and corporations involved in unauthorized agreements with these entities must be held accountable.


3. Legislative Safeguards to Prevent Future Foreign Policy Infiltration

A new constitutional amendment or legislative act must be introduced to prohibit U.S. policymakers from adopting or implementing international policies that bypass public consent and congressional approval. Severe penalties must be enforced for any elected official who attempts to override the Constitution in favor of foreign governance.


4. Public Disclosure & Revocation of Undisclosed Foreign Agreements

All agreements between U.S. public officials and foreign globalist organizations must be fully disclosed. Any existing agreement, treaty, or partnership violating U.S. sovereignty must be immediately revoked.

Affirmation:

By signing below, I affirm and declare that I am a living man or woman of sound mind, acting of my own free will.


I have read and understand the contents of this petition, and I sign it knowingly, willingly, and without coercion.


I understand that this petition is a lawful expression of the People’s right to petition for redress of grievances, and I add my signature as evidence of support and standing for the actions, remedies, and demands stated above.


I reserve all of my unalienable rights, waive none, and stand in honor, peace, and truth.

Please use the name on your current ID

For receiving physical affidavits, notices, or lawful documents related to future actions or lawsuits we open connected to this petition.

Petition to Redirect Foreign Aid Back to ‘We the People’

Addressed To:

  • The United States Congress

  • The President of the United States

  • The United States Supreme Court

  • The Department of the Treasury

  • The Office of Management and Budget (OMB)

  • The Government Accountability Office (GAO)

  • The Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

  • All State Legislatures & Governors

We, the undersigned, exercise our right to petition for redress of grievances under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, demanding the immediate halt of U.S. taxpayer dollars being sent as foreign aid while American citizens suffer. Our government’s first duty is to its own people, yet it continues to prioritize 181 foreign nations over its own struggling citizens and veterans.

Grievance:

The Unconstitutional Prioritization of Foreign Interests Over the American People

The massive redirection of tax dollars and newly printed currency to foreign nations has led to:


  1. Higher taxation on Americans with no direct benefit.

  2. Increased inflation due to reckless money printing to fund foreign aid.

  3. Neglected infrastructure, social services, and essential public programs at home.

  4. A worsening homelessness crisis, with veterans and families suffering while billions are sent abroad.


The United States government was established to serve the American people first and foremost. However, billions of dollars are allocated to foreign aid annually, while homelessness in America is at an all-time high—with over 580,466 Americans living on the streets, including 37,252 veterans (National Alliance to End Homelessness, 2019). Inflation is destroying the middle and lower class due to excessive money printing to fund foreign commitments. Americans are struggling with healthcare, housing, and basic necessities, yet foreign nations receive financial support while American families fall deeper into poverty.


The American Revolution was fought over a much smaller tax burden than what is imposed today—yet our tax dollars are spent without our consent on foreign nations instead of benefiting Americans. Where is the representation of the American people in deciding where our tax money goes?


States are unable to adequately address local crises because tax dollars that should go to infrastructure, healthcare, and schools are being diverted to foreign nations. Each state should have control over its own resources without being financially weakened by federal misallocation of funds.


The Grace Commission Report (1984) found that not a single penny of income tax revenue goes to essential services like roads, schools, or public infrastructure—instead, it is funneled into paying interest on government debt and foreign aid. The American people deserve full transparency and accountability for where our tax money is going and how it is being spent.

Legal Standing:

Constitutional & Case Law Precedents

1.  The U.S. Constitution

The Preamble states that the purpose of government is to: “Establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.” Sending billions overseas while Americans are suffering is a direct violation of these fundamental principles.


2.  United States v. Butler, 297 U.S. 1 (1936)

Ruled that federal spending must promote the general welfare of the people. Foreign aid does not promote the welfare of U.S. citizens and is therefore unconstitutional.


3.  South Dakota v. Dole, 483 U.S. 203 (1987)

Confirmed that federal funds must be used in ways that serve the national interest. Funding foreign governments while Americans suffer is a clear violation of this ruling.


4.  Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co., 157 U.S. 429 (1895)

Declared direct taxation without benefit to taxpayers unconstitutional. If American tax dollars are being sent overseas instead of benefiting the people, this principle is being violated.


5.  Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)

Established that any law or government action that violates the Constitution is void. Foreign aid at the expense of U.S. citizens is unconstitutional and should be halted immediately.

Redress of Grievance:

Our Demands

We, the People, demand an immediate halt to all foreign aid spending until full transparency and accountability are established, and the needs of Americans are prioritized.


1. Immediate Freeze on All Foreign Aid Spending

All foreign aid payments must be halted until a full review and public audit are conducted. No taxpayer dollars should be sent overseas while Americans remain homeless, jobless, or struggling with inflation.


2. Full Public Audit & Transparency on Where Taxpayer Money Is Going

The Treasury Department and IRS must release a full public report detailing:

  • How much money is allocated to foreign aid each year.

  • Where these funds are going and how they are being used.

  • Any unauthorized spending or fraud within these programs.


3. Legislative Action to Permanently Restrict Foreign Aid Unless Approved by the People

Congress must enact a bill requiring all future foreign aid to be subject to public vote or referendum. If Americans do not explicitly approve the spending of tax money abroad, it should not happen.


4. Immediate Reallocation of Foreign Aid Funds to Address Domestic Crises

The funds currently allocated to foreign aid must be redirected to:

  • Ending homelessness in America (especially for veterans).

  • Reducing the national debt to stabilize the economy.

  • Improving U.S. infrastructure, including roads, bridges, and public services.

  • Lowering inflation and the cost of living for American families.

5. Prohibition of the Use of Newly Printed Currency for Foreign Aid

Inflation is skyrocketing because the government prints new money to send overseas. We demand an immediate stop to the reckless printing of U.S. dollars for foreign nations.

Affirmation:

By signing below, I affirm and declare that I am a living man or woman of sound mind, acting of my own free will.


I have read and understand the contents of this petition, and I sign it knowingly, willingly, and without coercion.


I understand that this petition is a lawful expression of the People’s right to petition for redress of grievances, and I add my signature as evidence of support and standing for the actions, remedies, and demands stated above.


I reserve all of my unalienable rights, waive none, and stand in honor, peace, and truth.

Please use the name on your current ID

For receiving physical affidavits, notices, or lawful documents related to future actions or lawsuits we open connected to this petition.

Petition to Redirect Government Funds & Forces Toward Stopping Child Trafficking and Away from Victimless Commercial Crimes

Addressed To:

  • The United States Congress

  • The President of the United States

  • The United States Department of Justice (DOJ)

  • The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

  • The Department of Homeland Security (DHS)

  • The Office of the Inspector General (OIG)

  • The Government Accountability Office (GAO)

  • All State Legislatures & Governors

  • All Police Departments, Sheriff’s Offices, and Law Enforcement Agencies

  • All County and Municipal Budget Committees

We, the undersigned, exercise our right to petition for redress of grievances under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, demanding the immediate redirection of all public funds, enforcement manpower, and surveillance resources away from victimless commercial infractions—and toward the identification, investigation, and prosecution of child traffickers, pedophiles, and exploiters of the vulnerable. Government forces—originally created to serve and protect the people—have been transformed into revenue-generating arms of a corporate system. Meanwhile, our children are left unprotected, missing, exploited, or abused, while agencies chase private individuals for traffic tickets, curfews, paperwork infractions, and other commercial "offenses" that have no living victim.

Grievance:

The Systematic Misuse of Public Funds and Power

Law enforcement and surveillance technologies are heavily used to enforce corporate statutes such as:


  1. Traffic infractions with no victim (e.g., speeding, failure to signal, expired tags)

  2. Driving without a license or insurance (when not engaged in commerce)

  3. Parking violations or code enforcement on private property

  4. Curfew or ordinance violations with no injured party

  5. Administrative offenses (e.g., expired licenses, business filings)

  6. Operating a private vehicle without commercial registration


These are not crimes under natural law, as there is no injured party, no property damage, and no harm to another living soul. These infractions are designed solely to extract money from the people, while failing to protect the most vulnerable in our society—our children.


Because the government is now a corporate entity, it claims to be the "victim" in victimless crimes. This is fraudulent and unconstitutional, because a corporation is not a living being and cannot be physically harmed. “Harming the state” by going over a speed limit or missing a registration date is not a real crime, yet it is enforced with violence, arrest, and court fees.


These resources should be used to catch actual predators, not fine parents who miss a traffic court date.


While peaceful citizens are fined, jailed, and surveilled for minor code violations:


  1. Children are being bought and sold online and across state lines.

  2. Child pornography and online grooming are widespread and underinvestigated.

  3. Missing children are not pursued with urgency.

  4. Foster care systems have become pipelines for abuse.

  5. Law enforcement agencies often lack or underfund task forces dedicated to child trafficking and exploitation.


This is not only backwards and immoral, it is a breach of the fundamental duty of every adult and public servant to protect the innocent.

Legal Standing:

Constitutional & Case Law Precedents

1.  The U.S. Constitution

The Preamble to the Constitution; “…to establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence…” Failing to protect children while policing peaceful people for profit violates the foundational purpose of government. The Fourth and Fifth Amendments; surveillance and enforcement for victimless infractions violates the right to be secure in one’s person and property, and often leads to deprivation of property and liberty without due process.


2.  People v. Battle, 50 Cal. App. 3d Supp. 1 (1975)

Recognized that a crime requires a victim; statutes criminalizing behavior without harm to another are questionable.


3.  Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)

Any law or enforcement that contradicts the Constitution is null and void. Harassing peaceful individuals under corporate policy is not constitutional law.


4.  Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F.2d 946 (1973)

“There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of constitutional rights.” Ticketing and jailing peaceful travelers violates their unalienable rights.

Redress of Grievance:

Our Demands

1. An Immediate Public Audit of Police Budgets and Enforcement Priorities

We demand a full financial and operational audit of police departments and related agencies, to determine:

  • How much funding is spent on victimless crime enforcement

  • How many officers and resources are dedicated to commercial infractions vs. child crimes

  • What surveillance technologies are used against the people rather than against predators


2. Full Redirection of Funds and Forces Toward Protecting Children

All non-violent, victimless crime enforcement be deprioritized immediately. Police forces be mandated to build and expand child protection units. Federal, state, and local funds be redirected toward tracking trafficking networks, busting grooming rings, and rescuing exploited children.


3. Legal Reform to Abolish Corporate “Victim” Enforcement

The state cannot claim to be an injured party in a traffic ticket or code violation. We demand immediate legal reform to:

  • Prohibit prosecution of peaceful people under corporate statutes without a living victim

  • Protect children over profits, and ensure that force is never again misused for revenue

Affirmation:

By signing below, I affirm and declare that I am a living man or woman of sound mind, acting of my own free will.


I have read and understand the contents of this petition, and I sign it knowingly, willingly, and without coercion.


I understand that this petition is a lawful expression of the People’s right to petition for redress of grievances, and I add my signature as evidence of support and standing for the actions, remedies, and demands stated above.


I reserve all of my unalienable rights, waive none, and stand in honor, peace, and truth.

Please use the name on your current ID

For receiving physical affidavits, notices, or lawful documents related to future actions or lawsuits we open connected to this petition.

Petition to Restore the Second Amendment Right to Bear Arms & Unincorporate Firearms

Addressed To:

  • The United States Congress

  • The President of the United States

  • The United States Supreme Court

  • The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF)

  • The Department of Justice (DOJ)

  • The Department of Homeland Security (DHS)

  • All State Legislatures & Governors

  • All Law Enforcement and Policing Agencies, National Guard & State Militia Authorities

We, the undersigned, exercise our right to petition for redress of grievances under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, demanding the immediate restoration of the unalienable, unregulated, and uncommercialized right to bear arms as written in the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. We further demand the unincorporation of firearms from commercial jurisdiction, and the dissolution of unlawful, for-profit regulatory control over our sacred right to self-defense, community defense, and national protection.

Grievance:

The Corporate Violation of the Right to Bear Arms

The Second Amendment is not a privilege—it is a natural, God-given right that the government is forbidden to infringe upon. Yet today, we are treated like employees of a corporate state, our rights converted into privileges, and our ability to defend ourselves licensed, tracked, and criminalized.


The language of the Second Amendment is clear; “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” The word “regulated” in historical context means “well-trained” or “well-equipped.” It does not mean controlled or restricted by the government. The “militia” is We the People, not government police forces or state-sponsored troops. The right to bear arms is not granted by government, it is acknowledged by the Constitution as a pre-existing right that the government may not touch.


Through legal wordplay, the government redefined “arms” into the corporate term “firearms,” pulling the right into commercial jurisdiction. This allowed for licensing, registration, taxation, waiting periods, background checks, and incarceration under the pretense of public safety—when in fact, it is a violation of the right itself.


The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) was never properly established by an original act of Congress as a stand-alone federal agency, but rather evolved through bureaucratic reorganization from a tax unit within the Treasury Department. Its authority was expanded and reassigned through executive orders and legislative restructuring, such as the Homeland Security Act of 2002, without direct constitutional authorization. This sidesteps the requirement under Article I, Section 1 and Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution, which vests all legislative power in Congress and requires that federal agencies exercising regulatory or enforcement authority be lawfully created through legislative action.


As such, the ATF’s existence and actions arguably violate the Separation of Powers Doctrine, infringe upon the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms, and violate the Tenth Amendment by exercising federal powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution nor reserved to the states or the people.

Legal Standing:

Constitutional & Case Law Precedents

1.  The U.S. Constitution

The Second Amendment; “…the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” No commercial policy, code, or regulatory agency can override this. The Ninth Amendment; “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” Private militia rights, common defense, and natural liberty are not to be reduced or removed through bureaucratic limitations. The Tenth Amendment; “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution… are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” No federal corporate agency has power to regulate arms that are held by the people outside of commerce.


2.  District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008)

Affirmed the individual right to possess firearms unconnected with service in a militia, and to use them for lawful purposes such as self-defense within the home. Also affirmed that the Second Amendment is not limited to state militias.


3.  McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010)

Extended the Second Amendment protections to apply against state and local governments, confirming the federal constitutional protection.


4.  Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)

“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” This includes any statute or code restricting the free exercise of the right to bear arms.


5.  Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906)

Clarified the distinction between natural persons and artificial entities, confirming that the individual is not subject to the same commercial statutes as corporations.

Redress of Grievance:

Our Demands

1. Recognition that the Right to Bear Arms is Unalienable

All laws, regulations, and corporate codes that restrict or condition the right to keep and bear arms must be nullified or recognized as applying only within commercial jurisdiction. Private, peaceful Americans not engaged in commerce shall not be subject to federal firearms laws or regulatory enforcement.


2. Immediate Unincorporation of Firearms

The term “firearms” must be legally distinguished from private arms held by non-commercial individuals. We demand the removal of all licensing, registration, and federal oversight of arms carried for personal and community defense.


3. Defunding & Dissolution of ATF Authority Over Private Citizens

The ATF’s fraudulent jurisdiction over natural people must end. All enforcement actions against private individuals must be overturned, investigated, and permanently banned.


4. Establishment of Public Militia Training & Access

The people must be given access to community-based militia training programs and facilities, unregulated by the state, to form lawful peacekeeping bodies for the protection of life, liberty, and property. This is required by the Second Amendment and necessary to secure a free state.

Affirmation:

By signing below, I affirm and declare that I am a living man or woman of sound mind, acting of my own free will.


I have read and understand the contents of this petition, and I sign it knowingly, willingly, and without coercion.


I understand that this petition is a lawful expression of the People’s right to petition for redress of grievances, and I add my signature as evidence of support and standing for the actions, remedies, and demands stated above.


I reserve all of my unalienable rights, waive none, and stand in honor, peace, and truth.

Please use the name on your current ID

For receiving physical affidavits, notices, or lawful documents related to future actions or lawsuits we open connected to this petition.

Petition to Halt Unvetted Immigration & Secure America's Borders

Addressed To:

  • The United States Congress

  • The President of the United States

  • The United States Supreme Court

  • The Department of Homeland Security (DHS)

  • The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)

  • The Department of Defense (DOD)

  • The Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)

  • All State Legislatures & Governors

We, the undersigned, exercise our right to petition for redress of grievances under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, demanding the immediate halt of unvetted immigration and the restoration of constitutional border security to protect American nationals and citizens, our states, and our national sovereignty. Unvetted immigration has jeopardized national security, undermined state sovereignty, threatened domestic tranquility, and placed Americans at risk—all while American-born citizens and nationals are subject to stringent verification and identification processes to access their own country’s benefits and privileges.

Grievance:

The Unconstitutional Breach of Our Borders & National Security Threat

The unprecedented influx of unvetted immigrants into the United States violates the Constitution, national security protocols, and the fundamental right of American citizens and nationals to a secure homeland.


Congress is granted the power to establish uniform rules of naturalization. Unvetted immigration violates this constitutional mandate, as no uniform system is being upheld.


The Constitution explicitly states that the government must “insure domestic tranquility.” The lack of border security has led to increased crime, human trafficking, and the erosion of community safety.


The oath of office taken by public officials requires them to uphold the Constitution and protect the nation from threats. Allowing unvetted immigrants into law enforcement and military roles contradicts this duty and presents a serious risk to public safety.


American citizens and nationals are required to show identification, comply with strict verification laws, and follow due process for jobs, benefits, and legal privileges. Illegal immigrants, in contrast, are allowed entry without documentation or compliance. This violates the Equal Protection Clause, which mandates that laws apply fairly to all individuals under U.S. jurisdiction.


The DoD permits the use of deadly force against civilians in certain circumstances (DoD 5240.01 Sec 3.3(c)). Introducing unvetted individuals into the military and law enforcement endangers American citizens and our constitutional protections against unlawful use of force.

Legal Standing:

Constitutional & Case Law Precedents

1.  The U.S. Constitution

The U.S. Constitution’s Guarantee Clause (Article IV, Section 4) states: “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion.” By failing to secure the border, the federal government is violating its duty to protect the states from invasion. The Tenth Amendment reserves powers to the states that are not delegated to the federal government. States have the right to enforce their own border laws when the federal government fails to protect their citizens.


2.  Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012)

Established that states have a role in enforcing immigration laws and can take action when federal enforcement is lacking.


3.  United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)

Affirmed that citizenship must be clearly defined and governed by law. The current lack of vetting contradicts this legal precedent.


4.  Texas v. United States, 809 F.3d 134 (5th Cir. 2015)

The federal government was found to have overstepped its authority in granting broad immigration benefits without congressional approval. Unchecked executive policies allowing unvetted immigrants to remain violate federal law.


5.  Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S. Ct. 2392 (2018)

Ruled that the President has broad authority to restrict immigration based on national security concerns. Immediate action must be taken to secure the border against national security threats.

Redress of Grievance:

Our Demands

We, the People, demand immediate action to halt unvetted immigration and secure our nation’s borders, in accordance with the Constitution, national security laws, and state sovereignty rights.


1. Immediate Enforcement of U.S. Immigration Laws & Border Security

The southern border must be secured immediately, using military and National Guard resources if necessary. Illegal crossings must be prevented, and all individuals entering the country must be properly vetted.


2. Mandatory Vetting of All Immigrants & Immigration Applicants

No individual should be granted entry into the U.S. without full identity verification, criminal background checks, and compliance with immigration law. Asylum applicants must prove a legitimate claim, with immediate deportation for fraudulent claims.


3. Investigation into Government & NGO Collusion in Illegal Immigration

A congressional investigation must be launched into:

  • Federal, state, and local officials facilitating illegal immigration.

  • NGOs and foreign organizations funding and coordinating mass migration.

  • Whether taxpayer money is being unlawfully used to fund illegal immigration programs.


4. Strict Ban on Unvetted Immigrants in Law Enforcement & Military Roles

No non-citizen or unvetted immigrant should be allowed in the military or law enforcement. A full audit of all foreign-born personnel in these roles must be conducted immediately.


5. Enforcement of State Sovereignty to Protect Borders

States must be empowered to protect their borders when the federal government fails to do so. Governors and state legislatures must have the legal authority to reject illegal federal immigration mandates.

Affirmation:

By signing below, I affirm and declare that I am a living man or woman of sound mind, acting of my own free will.


I have read and understand the contents of this petition, and I sign it knowingly, willingly, and without coercion.


I understand that this petition is a lawful expression of the People’s right to petition for redress of grievances, and I add my signature as evidence of support and standing for the actions, remedies, and demands stated above.


I reserve all of my unalienable rights, waive none, and stand in honor, peace, and truth.

Please use the name on your current ID

For receiving physical affidavits, notices, or lawful documents related to future actions or lawsuits we open connected to this petition.

Petition to Restore the Right to God-Given Plant Medicines for Holistic Healing, Spiritual, and Religious Use

Addressed To:

  • The United States Congress

  • The President of the United States

  • The United States Supreme Court

  • The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

  • The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)

  • The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)

  • The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)

  • The American Medical Association (AMA)

  • All State Legislatures and Public Health Departments

  • All Pharmaceutical Corporations & Lobbying Bodies

  • All Healthcare Providers and Medical Experts/Educators Who Withhold or Suppress Natural Remedies

We, the undersigned, exercise our sacred right to petition for redress of grievances under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, demanding the immediate decriminalization, protection, and lawful restoration of access to God-given plant medicines for holistic healing, spiritual awakening, and religious freedom. This is not just a matter of medical autonomy—it is a matter of natural law, spiritual sovereignty, and human rights.

Grievance:

The Unlawful Criminalization of God-Given Healing Plants

Plant Medicine is a birthright, not a controlled substance. Natural medicines such as cannabis, hemp, psilocybin mushrooms, ayahuasca, peyote, and other unaltered plants have been used for centuries by cultures around the world to heal trauma, purify the body, expand consciousness, and commune with the divine.


These plants are not chemically synthesized; do not belong to any corporation; and were given freely by the Earth and the Creator.


And yet, through a fraudulent legal system designed to commercialize health and criminalize nature, these sacred plants have been labeled “dangerous drugs” and placed under corporate-controlled scheduling systems by the DEA and FDA—with no lawful authority to override natural law or the Constitution.


The Flexner Report & Rockefeller Medical Takeover (1910–1920s); Homeopathy, herbalism, and natural medicine were systematically dismantled through the Flexner Report, funded by the Carnegie Foundation. John D. Rockefeller, who had deep investment in chemical/pharmaceutical industries, funded only synthetic-drug-based medical schools, ensuring that natural healing was labeled “quackery” and driven underground. The resulting medical-industrial complex now functions as a for-profit cartel pushing lifelong pharmaceutical dependency, while criminalizing plants that offer true healing and liberation.


The very corporations lobbying against natural plant medicine are repeat offenders in widespread criminal fraud:


  • GlaxoSmithKline had a fine/settlement of $3 Billion (2012) for the offense of fraud, illegal promotion, suppression of safety data

  • Pfizer had a fine/settlement of $2.3 Billion (2009) for the offense of false claims, off-label marketing

  • Johnson & Johnson had a fine/settlement of $2.2 Billion (2013) for the offense of criminal and civil violations

  • Teva had a fine/settlement of $450 Million (2024) for the offense of price-fixing, kickbacks

  • And many more...


If ordinary citizens acted like these corporations, they'd be imprisoned. But Big Pharma pays a fine, avoids prosecution, and keeps profiting—while natural healers are jailed.

Legal Standing:

Constitutional & Case Law Precedents

1.  The U.S. Constitution

The First Amendment; the use of plant medicines for ceremony, connection to the divine, and spiritual healing is a protected right. Denying this right violates religious liberty and spiritual sovereignty. The Ninth Amendment; the right to use natural, unaltered plants is retained by the people. Just because it isn’t listed explicitly in the Constitution doesn’t mean it can be lawfully denied.


2.  Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal, 546 U.S. 418 (2006)

Supreme Court upheld the use of ayahuasca for religious practice under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).


3.  Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990)

Although limited, this case acknowledged that certain religious uses of substances are constitutionally protected.


4.  Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)

“Any law repugnant to the Constitution is void.” Corporate statutes criminalizing plant medicine are unconstitutional when applied to peaceful use.


5.  Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906)

Distinguished natural persons from artificial entities, affirming natural persons’ right to operate privately, outside corporate jurisdiction.

Redress of Grievance:

Our Demands

1. Immediate Decriminalization and Declassification of All Unaltered Plant Medicines

Any unaltered, God-given plant—such as cannabis, psilocybin mushrooms, ayahuasca, or peyote—must be immediately removed from the list of controlled substances. These plants must be recognized as sacred, lawful, and naturally protected.


2. Full Recognition of the Spiritual, Religious, and Holistic Use of Plant Medicines

Sacred use of plant medicine must be recognized as constitutionally protected under religious freedom and spiritual expression. Government interference in ceremony, prayer, or healing practices using plant medicine is a violation of spiritual liberty.


3. The Right to Self-Heal Without Government Control

Peaceful men and women must have the absolute right to choose how they heal, without being fined, jailed, or harassed. Government agencies must be forbidden from regulating private, natural healing choices.


4. Federal Audit and Investigation Into Big Pharma’s Suppression of Natural Healing

A public investigation must be launched into how pharmaceutical companies have influenced laws, media, medical schools, and regulatory bodies to suppress plant medicine. The people deserve full transparency, truth, and restitution.

Affirmation:

By signing below, I affirm and declare that I am a living man or woman of sound mind, acting of my own free will.


I have read and understand the contents of this petition, and I sign it knowingly, willingly, and without coercion.


I understand that this petition is a lawful expression of the People’s right to petition for redress of grievances, and I add my signature as evidence of support and standing for the actions, remedies, and demands stated above.


I reserve all of my unalienable rights, waive none, and stand in honor, peace, and truth.

Please use the name on your current ID

For receiving physical affidavits, notices, or lawful documents related to future actions or lawsuits we open connected to this petition.

What Happens Next?

Your submission is now part of a powerful lawful record. Under the First Amendment, no specific number of signatures is required to make a petition lawful—but to maximize impact, we’re aiming for national-level reach on every petition so they can be formally submitted to Congress, federal agencies, and/or the Supreme Court. One voice is enough to stand—but thousands make it impossible to ignore.

Once we hit our milestone of 10,000 to 100,000+ signatures/autographs, these petitions will be:

- Served as legal notice to the proper authorities/agencies

- Used as admissible evidence of public will and harm

- Followed by affidavits and lawful notices of default if no remedy is given

- Used to open lawsuits or lawful claims on behalf of We the People

This is how we lawfully demand change—and your action is a vital part of that process.

Thank you for taking a stand. Now share it, spread it, and help us grow this movement.

How to become a state national What is a state national Correcting political status Right to travel without a licens

Donation/Mailing Address:

​

P.O. Box 844,

Eagle Pass,

Texas Republic

[78853]

Boring Things To Read:

​

Membership Contract

Terms & Conditions

Privacy Policy

Refund Policy

Need Assistance?

​

Login Assistance

Order Assistance

Membership Assistance

Contact Us

Notices & Site Security:

​

Notice to All Agents

Common Law TM © 2022 - 2025 by House of Rocks PMA. Powered and secured by Wix

Follow Us on Social Media:

  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • Telegram
  • Spotify
  • iHeart Podcasts
  • Apple Podcasts

Contact Us:

​info@statenationalsrock.com​

State Nationals Rock is a Project of House of Rocks PMA; a self-supported Private Ministry 508(c)(1)(a) and Private Membership Association held in trust, operating solely in the private domain and not as a public business. State Nationals Rock does not offer legal, financial, medical, or professional advice; all information and content is for educational purposes only. All members are solely responsible for their own actions, decisions, and due diligence, and by engaging with this content, they acknowledge and accept full accountability for their personal research and choices.

bottom of page